Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Relativity
Jump to: navigation, search
(text for right-hand column)
Line 1: Line 1:
<strong>WELCOME TO RELATIVITY</strong>
+
<table class="MainPageBG" style="border-spacing: 8px; width:100%; border:0px solid #cfcfcf; background:#ffffff; vertical-align:top; color:#000; margin: 4px;">
 +
<tr>
 +
<td colspan=2 style="width:100%; margin: 3px; vertical-align:top; background:#f4f4f4; border: 1px solid #cecece; padding: .25em; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">
 +
<h2 style="margin: 3px; padding: 0.8em; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;" >
 +
WELCOME TO RELATIVITY </h2>
  
 
You've arrived just as this set of pages are being assembled online!  
 
You've arrived just as this set of pages are being assembled online!  
  
 
Currently (as of July 2016) this is still at the "first prototype" stage – many pages are missing, are placeholders, or are still missing references, notes and proper cross-linking.  
 
Currently (as of July 2016) this is still at the "first prototype" stage – many pages are missing, are placeholders, or are still missing references, notes and proper cross-linking.  
 +
 +
The aim of these pages is to try to explain a range of advanced concepts in relativity theory with the minimum of mathematics, so that most people with a very basic grounding or interest in science should be able to understand them.
  
 
'''EB'''
 
'''EB'''
==Sections under preparation:==
+
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 
 +
<tr>
 +
<td style="width:50%; margin: .3em; vertical-align:top; background:#f5fffa; border: 1px solid #cef2e0; padding: .25em; Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">
 +
<h2 style="margin: 3px; padding: 0.4em; background: #cef2e0; border: 1px solid #c0c0c0; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;" >Sections under preparation:</h2>
 +
 
 
* [[Einstein]]
 
* [[Einstein]]
* [[Special Relativity]]
 
 
* [[General Relativity]]
 
* [[General Relativity]]
 
** [[Advanced General Relativity]]
 
** [[Advanced General Relativity]]
 +
* [[Special Relativity]]
 +
 +
</td>
 +
 +
<td class="MainPageBG" style="width:50%; border:1px solid #cedff2; background:#f5faff; vertical-align:top; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">
 +
<h2 style="margin: 3px; padding: 0.4em; background: #cedff2; border: 1px solid #c0c0c0; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;" >The "social problem" in physics</h2>
 +
 +
<div style="margin: 2em; width: 40em; font-size: 0.8em;">
 +
The purpose of most relativity textbooks is to teach students to use, understand and embrace current theory, in order that they can become fully-qualified practitioners. It is considered in the interest of the students not to confuse their minds with the more troubling issues in current theory, lest by failing to "believe", they become sidetracked by troubling inconsistencies in the theory, and become distracted from their studies. Students are taught that special relativity is correct beyond a shadow of a doubt and is to be regarded as fact, that SR testing was carried out to the highest standards, that general relativity is one of the greatest theories of all time, that there are no cracks or flaws in the system, and that everything in the relativistic garden smells lovely.
 +
 +
Unfortunately, none of this is true.
 +
 +
Einstein called the design of his own 1916 general theory "unjustifiable", and the theory was then found to be ''logically inconsistent'' in 1960. In short, it was a bad theory. The principles of the relativity of rotation and acceleration are now known to be fundamentally incompatible with the geometry and equations of special relativity (1960), so although Einstein's 1916 theory was designed to incorporate SR, its SR component essentially makes the theory self-destruct. GR was "fudged" in 1960 as a workaround, and is technically no longer a ''general'' theory of relativity, or a "principle theory". Then, in the 1970s, we found that the "fudge" also made the resulting system incompatible with quantum mechanics, making GR1960 incompatible with information theory and thermodynamics. Redesigning GR to work properly results in increased nonlinearity, the effects of which now appear to have been seen, but which we prefer to explain away with dark matter.
 +
 +
Other relativistic solutions were rejected without public study, testing procedures were compromised, the significance of evidence was misrepresented, and research into ''full'' general relativity was blocked. We were told that a theory of quantum gravity would come along soon that could incorporate GR1960 and QM "as-is", but we've been waiting for half a century for it, and it still hasn't arrived. It may never appear. 
 +
 +
In short, the current system of inertial and gravitational physics resembles a plane crash.   
 +
 +
On the plus side, if we don't ''need'' relativity theory to correspond to the mathematical mess in the current textbooks, the concepts become a lot simpler, and the way forward is not so difficult.
 +
 +
So, welcome to the Twenty-First Century, and congratulations for coming along at the right time. Physics is about to change. 
 +
</div>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>

Revision as of 20:50, 7 July 2016

WELCOME TO RELATIVITY

You've arrived just as this set of pages are being assembled online!

Currently (as of July 2016) this is still at the "first prototype" stage – many pages are missing, are placeholders, or are still missing references, notes and proper cross-linking.

The aim of these pages is to try to explain a range of advanced concepts in relativity theory with the minimum of mathematics, so that most people with a very basic grounding or interest in science should be able to understand them.

EB

Sections under preparation:

The "social problem" in physics

The purpose of most relativity textbooks is to teach students to use, understand and embrace current theory, in order that they can become fully-qualified practitioners. It is considered in the interest of the students not to confuse their minds with the more troubling issues in current theory, lest by failing to "believe", they become sidetracked by troubling inconsistencies in the theory, and become distracted from their studies. Students are taught that special relativity is correct beyond a shadow of a doubt and is to be regarded as fact, that SR testing was carried out to the highest standards, that general relativity is one of the greatest theories of all time, that there are no cracks or flaws in the system, and that everything in the relativistic garden smells lovely.

Unfortunately, none of this is true.

Einstein called the design of his own 1916 general theory "unjustifiable", and the theory was then found to be logically inconsistent in 1960. In short, it was a bad theory. The principles of the relativity of rotation and acceleration are now known to be fundamentally incompatible with the geometry and equations of special relativity (1960), so although Einstein's 1916 theory was designed to incorporate SR, its SR component essentially makes the theory self-destruct. GR was "fudged" in 1960 as a workaround, and is technically no longer a general theory of relativity, or a "principle theory". Then, in the 1970s, we found that the "fudge" also made the resulting system incompatible with quantum mechanics, making GR1960 incompatible with information theory and thermodynamics. Redesigning GR to work properly results in increased nonlinearity, the effects of which now appear to have been seen, but which we prefer to explain away with dark matter.

Other relativistic solutions were rejected without public study, testing procedures were compromised, the significance of evidence was misrepresented, and research into full general relativity was blocked. We were told that a theory of quantum gravity would come along soon that could incorporate GR1960 and QM "as-is", but we've been waiting for half a century for it, and it still hasn't arrived. It may never appear.

In short, the current system of inertial and gravitational physics resembles a plane crash.

On the plus side, if we don't need relativity theory to correspond to the mathematical mess in the current textbooks, the concepts become a lot simpler, and the way forward is not so difficult.

So, welcome to the Twenty-First Century, and congratulations for coming along at the right time. Physics is about to change.